Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

The focus is within the intention to cause injury. This can be a major issue: an especially very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may well interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it proper into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

record with the department there isn't any record available whatsoever regarding promotion from the petitioner(Promotion)

This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the check here purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment within the offender, making sure they are held accountable for their actions.

The Court considered the case to generally be maintainable under Article 184 (three) since the Risk and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Even though the pair had two young children of their very own at home, the social worker did not tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report into the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had youthful children.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may be regarded as, however, we're very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, topic to availability of vacancy matter on the approval with the competent authority.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved unless case is experimented with(Bail Matters)

share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property can also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--